A US investor has purchased Sterling Treasury bills and wishes to hedge against the falling value of Sterling. Buying the out-of-the-money put (strike price $1.8500) will protect against a fall below that figure. The sale of the out-of-the-money call at $1.8900 will mean that the investor will benefit from any rise in Sterling to $1.8900 but not above that figure. The cost of buying the put is off-set by the revenue from writing the call, resulting in this instance in a zero cost strategy.

The reader will note that if Sterling rises above $1.8900, the written call position will make a loss. This is off-set by the rising value in dollar terms of the underlying Sterling investment. Conversely, if Sterling falls below $1.8850, the puts make a profit which off-sets the currency losses on the investment in the Sterling Treasury bills. Read more »

Posted: June 22nd, 2008 under Commodities Futures, Currency Futures, Equity Futures, Future Fund, Futures Contracts, Futures Options, Futures Spreads, Futures Trader, Futures Trading System, Managed Futures, S&P Futures.
Comments: 4

The investment manager may have a number of bond-like assets in the portfolio, and corporate treasurers may have issued similar liabilities which have options embedded within them by virtue of the contract terms under which the bonds were issued. Common examples of such bonds are as follows.

• Bonds with call provisions allow the issuer to call the issue at a date earlier than the redemption date, at a price different from par but specified when the bond is issued. Bonds with sinking funds attached also have an embedded option.

• Putable bonds give the holder the option to put the bond back to the issuer at a predetermined price.

• Convertible bonds give the holder the option of converting the bond into the equity of the issuer. The rate of conversion and the time is specified when the bonds are issued. Some convertible bonds have been issued that provide for conversion into other bonds.

Read more »

Posted: June 15th, 2008 under Futures Options, Swap Futures.
Comments: 5

Asset swaps are different, in that they are linked to the purchase of an asset and the swapping of the cash flows of that asset. They are therefore used synthetically to engineer an asset structure rather than a liability structure.

The idea behind an asset swap is to enhance returns to the investor rather than hedging or lowering costs to a borrower. The objective is to find some underpriced fixed rate bond which is then purchased by an investor that would prefer a floating rate investment. The coupons are then swapped with a bank that has fixed rate liabilities at a lower cost. The bank thereby receives a fixed payment that is higher than the cost of its existing fixed rate debt. Read more »

Posted: June 8th, 2008 under Future Management, Futures Index, Futures Market, Futures Options, Futures Prices, Futures Spreads, Futures Trading System, Managed Futures, Swap Futures.
Comments: 3

Use of a Managed Futures Account to Enhance Overall Portfolio Return

Overall portfolio increases from 12% to 14.3%, or approximately 20%.

This concept is the backbone of Modern Portfolio Theory developed by Harry Markowitz in the 1950s, as referenced earlier. The investor sorts through various allocations of his or her assets to find what is known as the efficient frontier. This is the best mixture of assets to generate the most return with the least amount of fluctuation or volatility. The allocation or reallocation process needs to be reviewed periodically, as economic conditions change. Investments, for example, that do well during inflationary periods, like physical commodities, should be increased as the CPI rises and reduced as it falls. Read more »

Posted: March 4th, 2008 under Uncategorized.
Comments: 3

The professionals within this industry have their own trade association, the Managed Futures Association. Its function is to assist members, to promote the industry, and to advance the industry. They produce an excellent monthly professional journal that discusses issues important to members, everything from legislation, regulatory compliance, trade execution, to marketing. Their annual membership directory is an excellent source to find CTAs and CPOs.

Commodity pool operators are the individuals or corporations who structure funds. These are pools of commingled money from a number of individual investors. Most of the funds are large enough to require multiple CTAs. If the funds are properly selected, this further reduces risk, as we saw earlier. Most CPOs closely follow the performance of a large number of CTAs and analyze their performance. For this reason, CPOs can be excellent consultants in CTA selection. Read more »

Posted: March 4th, 2008 under Futures Index, Futures Market, Futures Options, Futures Prices, Futures Trading System, Managed Futures, investment.
Comments: 4

Direct Participation Programs

The next level up in size and complexity is direct participation programs, or DPPs. You may think of them as tax shelters or limited partnerships (LPs). They are constructed to pass through all of their income, gains, losses, and tax benefits to their owners. The partnership itself pays no taxes because the partners accept liability. Gas-oil exploration and real estate development are common LPs.

Unlike those big sisters, the commodity trading limited partnership is not a tax shelter. It is structured to provide limited liability to investors. The syndicator is the CTA or a CPO, and usually the general partner as well. These can be public or private. Private LPs are usually formed by a small group of wealthy investors, while public LPs attract large numbers of small ($2,000 to $5,000 minimum) investors. The latter requires a full-fledged prospectus and is more stringently watched by federal regulators. Both must be registered with the SEC. Read more »

Posted: March 2nd, 2008 under Corn Futures, Crude Oil Futures, Future Fund, Future Management, Future Trading, Futures, Futures Contracts, Futures Market, Futures Prices, Interest Rate Futures, Managed Futures, S&P Futures, Stock Market Futures, market.
Comments: 4

Concern

The size of the markets can work against foreign investors in two ways. First, some securities and some countries may be illiquid. In such markets, any reasonably sized trades are sufficient to move the price. The price rises when one wants to buy and falls upon a sale. This is particularly painful because most foreign investors end up selling and buying around the same time.

The second concern with market size is inefficiency. Emerging markets are known to be inefficient, and prices can take several days to fully reflect new information. As a passive investor, you can lose money to more sophisticated investors who trade on the basis of the inefficiency. Read more »

Posted: February 14th, 2008 under Commodities Futures, Future Investing, Future Management.
Comments: 4

Marketing of Offshore Futures Funds in Norway

The marketing of shares in an offshore futures fund in Norway is largely prohibited. If an investor approaches an intermediary and asks to invest in an offshore futures fund, the intermediary may help; but marketing using a prospectus, advertisement or other promotional material, including by way of a private placement, is prohibited.

Legislation

Current legislation for funds in Portugal is based on the Decree-Law 229-C/88, and allows for the formation of both open-ended and closed-ended funds in contractual form.

Such funds cannot at present invest in futures, although a review of the legislation is under way to incorporate the UCITS directive, and this may allow the use of futures in domestic funds for hedging purposes only. Read more »

Posted: February 8th, 2008 under Future Fund, Future Investing.
Comments: 5

Before the advent of managed futures funds in Europe, many European countries—but particularly the UK—suffered the attentions of unscrupulous and largely unregulated futures brokers. These unprofessional operators encouraged retail investors to open their own trading accounts, through which either the vicissitudes of the futures markets or the inflated nature of the brokers’ fees usually managed to ensure that the investors lost most of their money. Many of these unregulated practitioners arrived in Europe from the US, where the strict regulatory regime established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the CFTC had chased them out. The UK and continental Europe also managed to grow a few of their own cowboys.

Gradually, the introduction of a stronger regulatory regime across Europe and the growth of well-regulated managed futures funds — supported by their trade associations—have largely pushed the cowboys out of the forefront of the industry and out of existence, or into less well-regulated centres. Read more »

Posted: February 1st, 2008 under Future Broker, Future Fund, Future Investing, Futures Market, Managed Futures.
Comments: 5

Industry observers claim that the total effect of fee structures is to transfer almost all risk to the investor. This claim needs stating because it is a condition attached to futures funds which investors are finding less and less tolerable. With retail products the guaranteed funds have attempted to resolve this problem in terms of investor perception of risk, but for large institutional investors who can hedge their own risk, these fees are too high a price to pay for exposure to leverage.

Funds which recently described themselves as “changing the relationship between risk and reward in favour of the investor” do so through more sophisticated risk control program—in reality of course, the investor still bears the burden of financial losses. Read more »

Posted: January 31st, 2008 under Future Fund, Managed Futures.
Comments: 4