A US investor has purchased Sterling Treasury bills and wishes to hedge against the falling value of Sterling. Buying the out-of-the-money put (strike price $1.8500) will protect against a fall below that figure. The sale of the out-of-the-money call at $1.8900 will mean that the investor will benefit from any rise in Sterling to $1.8900 but not above that figure. The cost of buying the put is off-set by the revenue from writing the call, resulting in this instance in a zero cost strategy.

The reader will note that if Sterling rises above $1.8900, the written call position will make a loss. This is off-set by the rising value in dollar terms of the underlying Sterling investment. Conversely, if Sterling falls below $1.8850, the puts make a profit which off-sets the currency losses on the investment in the Sterling Treasury bills. Read more »

Posted: June 22nd, 2008 under Commodities Futures, Currency Futures, Equity Futures, Future Fund, Futures Contracts, Futures Options, Futures Spreads, Futures Trader, Futures Trading System, Managed Futures, S&P Futures.
Comments: 4

Average rate currency options are based upon the average exchange rate of the underlying currency as distinct from the exchange rate on a single date — the expiry date.

The advantage of an average rate option is that the volatility of a moving average of a variable is less than the volatility of individual observations of that same variable. With daily observations, and with the volatility levels seen in the currency markets, the volatility of the moving average is in the order of 60% of that of the raw observations. Consequently, the price of an average rate option with a given exercise price will be less than an otherwise identical standard European currency option. Read more »

Posted: June 21st, 2008 under Equity Futures, Future Market Trends, Futures Market, Futures Options, Futures Spreads, S&P Futures, Stock Market Futures, Swap Futures, investment.
Comments: 5

Term structure based option-pricing models

Term structure models of pricing contingent claims have followed one of two approaches. One approach followed by Cox, Ingersoll and Ross (1985) actually model the expected returns from movements in the term structure in order to price the contingent claims. In effect, the term structure becomes endogenous to the pricing of the contingent claim.

The second approach followed by Ho and Lee (1986), Heath, Jarrow and Morton (1989), Black, Derman and Toy (1990) and Hull and White (1990) utilizes the volatilities of the various sectors of the term structure to derive a probability distribution of an arbitrage-free binomial, trinomial or multinomial lattice of the term structure. From this lattice, contingent claims are priced. These models all have one thing in common: they allow for the whole-term structure to be stochastic instead of the price of a single underlying instrument or a single interest rate. The whole-term structure is represented at each node of the binomial, trinomial or even multinomiaf lattice. Read more »

Posted: June 15th, 2008 under Currency Futures, Future Fund, Future Management, Future Trading, Futures Index, Futures Market, Futures Prices, Futures Spreads, Futures Trader, Futures Trading System, Managed Futures, S&P Futures, Stock Futures, investment.
Comments: 3

Direct Participation Programs

The next level up in size and complexity is direct participation programs, or DPPs. You may think of them as tax shelters or limited partnerships (LPs). They are constructed to pass through all of their income, gains, losses, and tax benefits to their owners. The partnership itself pays no taxes because the partners accept liability. Gas-oil exploration and real estate development are common LPs.

Unlike those big sisters, the commodity trading limited partnership is not a tax shelter. It is structured to provide limited liability to investors. The syndicator is the CTA or a CPO, and usually the general partner as well. These can be public or private. Private LPs are usually formed by a small group of wealthy investors, while public LPs attract large numbers of small ($2,000 to $5,000 minimum) investors. The latter requires a full-fledged prospectus and is more stringently watched by federal regulators. Both must be registered with the SEC. Read more »

Posted: March 2nd, 2008 under Corn Futures, Crude Oil Futures, Future Fund, Future Management, Future Trading, Futures, Futures Contracts, Futures Market, Futures Prices, Interest Rate Futures, Managed Futures, S&P Futures, Stock Market Futures, market.
Comments: 4